Creating Sustainable Change in Back Office Transformation

Backgroundmust be properly defined in terms of the outputs
Changing sourcing arrangements from thevisible to customers. This exercise should lead to
traditional DIY vertical model only makes sense ifa degree of rationalisation. Usually functions which
new value can be created. The principle sourceshave evolved over time include some redundant
of value are:activity which is no longer valued by the
customer.ii. Process: Once you have a clear
1. Improved service quality -higher performancedefinition of the services to be offered you then
standards than the legacy function.need to ensure that they are being delivered in
2. Lower operating costs - should cost less thanthe most effective and efficient way. There are
the previous cost base.many techniques for improving process and
3. Investment avoidance - 'back office' functionsdifferent practitioners favour different methods.
require ongoing investment - particularly in IT.What is critical is that the process to deliver the
Depending on the platform, these investmentsrequired outputs is optimised both in terms of
can be controlled or avoided altogether a changequality and consistency of delivery and resource
in sourcing arrangements.utilisation.iii. Technology: Almost all business support
4. Flexibility - the service can be scaled up orfunctions can be improved by appropriate
down to cater for growth, acquisition ortechnology support. Once the process is optimised
divestment.it should be underpinned and automated by
5. Management focus - senior management cantechnology. I am not advocating bespoke
focus on core business challenges.software development. In theory, best practice in
6. Compliance - with an ever increasing regulatoryterms of process should be encapsulated in the
burden e.g. Sarbanes-Oxley, the risk ofsoftware design. All too often this is not the case.
non-compliance is lowered when using existingHaving selected the software which most closely
platformsreflects the optimum process design it will most
However merely changing the sourcinglikely be more cost effective to accept some
arrangements does not in itself necessarily realiseprocess variation than to attempt to customise
these potential improvements. They have to bethe software. Though Process and Technology
created by some kind of transformation orDesign are clearly separate domains they need to
discontinuity in the way service is provided.be viewed as a package or the results can be
Traditional 'People transfer' type outsourcingpainful.iv. Change Management: However expertly
where the entire function (often including theyou define and rationalise services, and then
people, technology and property) move to a newdesign process and deploy technology to deliver
organisation does not in itself create new valuethem - in the end all this must be accomplished
because nothing has changed. The outsourcer willthrough the endeavour of the employees. Their
have a plan of how to lower costs over time.motivation, comfort levels and perception of the
Value creation is more straightforward and the 'liftvalue to themselves is of the utmost importance
and drop' type of arrangement where the workin sustaining rapid and radical improvement. In any
moves to a new organisation but the means ofproject of this kind you can divide the people
production do not transfer. 'Offshoring' is anroughly into four camps.
example of this type of deal. Cost savings can be- Early adopters
made from arbitrage, and from aggregation.- The Undecided
In addition technology costs be lower on a larger- Overt dissidents
optimised platform and functionality may be- Covert dissidents
better. However, offshore operations create aThe distribution of these groups will vary but it's
raft of new and different problems to solve. Inlikely that 'the undecided' will be by far the largest
preparing business cases for new sourcing- perhaps as much as 60%. The leadership of the
arrangements it's critical to understand where theproject will then do battle with the dissidents for
new value is going to come from and how it willthe hearts and minds of that majority group. The
be realised. In recent years 'governance' hasoutcome of this contest will have a profound
become a key word in outsourcing and much haseffect on the outcome of the project. The
been written about best practice in governancetechnique is work through the early adopter group
design and operation. The fact is that in- empowering them to be agents of change.
arrangement where sufficient value is created forOvert dissidents can often be 'saved'. They are
both parties to enjoy good business benefits thepeople who believe in saying what they think and
governance is less difficult.are prepared to engage.
Too often a great deal of effort goes into arguingIf you can convince a few of these to come on
over the division of a 'cake' which is simply tooboard it can make a big difference. Covert
small. It makes more sense to devote that effortdissidents are the most difficult. They are the
into making the cake bigger instead. But how isones who will make sycophantic noises in the
this new value created and how can it bepublic forum but do everything they can to
sustained?undermine the project behind closed doors. They
Entrepreneurial mindsetsee malevolence and conspiracy behind every
It's critical that the new service views itself as aannouncement and initiative. It is important to
specialist provider of the services - that is theiridentify these people and confront them. It may
business. As such it has the same dynamics asbe best that they part company with the
any other business. It needs to develop andorganisation. If the leadership is successful in
nuture its own IP and differentiating factors. Itwinning over the Undecided then the project will
must identify, attract, develop, motivate andbeing to flourish and sustainable improvement
retain the right people. It must sell its services intobecomes a real possibility.v. Infrastructure: Very
the marketplace and grow revenues year onoften back office functions have poor
year. It must design pricing and operating modelsinfrastructure. They may operate out of poor real
such that it generates an attractive margin forestate both in terms of location, quality and
stakeholders. Whether the 'new' provider is anlayout. They may have poor equipment and
internally managed shared service or an outsourcematerials. Investing in infrastructure can often
vendor - it is now a provider of (for example) HRproduce a payback both financially and in terms of
services to customers - not the support functionimproved performance. Better designed facilities
of a company producing food products. This iswill often occupy less floor space producing a
important because the top talent, managementdirect operational saving. Attention to Indirect
focus and investment budget available to the foodProcurement categories also has strong cost
company will quite rightly be directed at the corereduction potential in addition to opening the way
business.to 'fit for purpose' provision of the right tools to
Those working in 'support services' will bedo the job.
regarded as of secondary importance. They willProgramme Management
not enjoy the same career prospects or rewardsEach of these five areas can yield significant
as those working in the core business howeverbenefits in terms of transformation - but the key
exceptional they may be. Their departments willis to work all these elements together in a
struggle to compete for the investment requiredco-ordinated plan - Programme Management.
to keep quality at benchmark levels. This is aThere are some consecutive elements and some
critical underlying change factor in back offices. Itconcurrent efforts.
will be at its strongest in an enterprise partnershipWhile the design of each individual programme will
model because the former back office becomesbe different to take into account context and
a new stand alone business with the freedom tocultural factors - the principles are shown above.
reward those who contribute to business growth.Managing the Programme and the people is an
A traditional people transfer type deal or a 'lift andongoing task. The Change Management challenge
drop' deal will experience this change in as far asbegins before the deal is signed and continues
the outsourcer has an entrepreneurial approach.throughout the transformation process.
In a shared service arrangement much will dependInfrastructure development can have long lead
on the way the service is set up. If it is set up astimes due to existing leases or supply
a profit centre rather than a cost recoveryagreements. Deriving benefit in this area will
operation it will have a more entrepreneurialinvolve a series of discreet projects that will
outlook - but internally that can be seen as a 'zeronormally need to be completed in a coherent
sum game' and there can be resentment at aorder. Service, Process and Technology need to
new profit centre creating revenues 'at thebe approached in that order as noted above -
expense' of an established profit centre. While anwith the important caveat that the use of
entrepreneurial mindset does not directly createstandard technology platforms is in itself an
sustainable change it cannot be underestimated asimportant route to value. However, it is important
a powerful motivational factor. Outsourceto follow the design process logically first and then
providers are potentially well placed to introduceunderstand the potential for increasing value
this entrepreneurial attitude. There talent withinthrough modification of the processes.
these companies can be a valuable source ofA critical aspect of Programme Management is
innovation and new thinking - both inside theensure that sustainability is built into the overall
scope of a sourcing arrangement and potentiallyapproach. At today's pace of change assumptions
outside it as well.made in the business case can erode rapidly so
A Systematic Approachthese must be kept under constant review. Failing
Creating superior performance in back officeto do this can lead to 'value leakage' - where
functions requires an analysis of the successbusiness benefits can dissolve. This is a particular
factors - both direct factors and those whichdanger in a long outsourcing contract where the
enable stronger performance. There are five keyprovider may be relying on a stable period of
areas:i. Service: Most back office functions are nothigher margins at the end of the contract to
service orientated. They are 'gatekeepers of thecompensate for more volatility and lower margins
process' there to tell you what you can or can'tin the earlier years.
have. This mindset has to change in the newConclusion
sourcing arrangement. A satisfied customer is oneThe key to creating new value in back office
whose perception of the service they havetransformation is to undertake a well designed
received is at least equal to their expectation. Thiscoherent programme of multi-dimensional
is critical to understand. Their perception of theimprovement. However, if one thing matters
service may not be the same as an objectiveabove all others it is to change the culture and
measurement of technical delivery. Research has'mindset'. Without this change is unlikely to be
shown that quality of delivery accounts for onlysustainable because initiatives will be blocked and
one third of service perception. Customercrowded out. It can be likened to trying to
expectation needs to be understood and ifre-direct a river. If the effort falters for a
necessary modified and managed. Too often thismoment the water will find its old course again.
important activity is omitted. The service offered