Hedge Fund Ad-ban.. Causing More Problems Than Its Worth?

If ever there was an argument for thenondisclosure agreements."
advertising ban on Hedge Funds to be lifted it isThis 'secrecy' is what perpetuates the fraud.
this one. Over three years a brazen group ofSimply put, the peddlers of this scheme will tell
New York scam artists raised about $30 millionyou that when you do your research that you will
from unsuspecting investors by posing asfind everyone denying the existence of the
principals of a successful hedge fund and then fledscheme. They will say that those not in the
with the loot.industry don't know about it because there would
Investments from $5,000 to $500,000 werebe outrage that rich people could make so much
obtained from college professors and educatedmoney and those in the industry will deny it
professionals. It took the group a little more thanbecause they either aren't high enough up or are
three years, from early 2003 September 2006 totrying to keep it a total secret. They will also tell
raise the $30 million.you that a minimum investment of $10mn is the
A grand jury empaneled by Michael J. Garcia, thenorm, but they have split up that $10mn to allow
U.S. Attorney in Manhattan, is said to have handedtheir investors in.
up a sealed indictment in the case, according to aThis secrecy is the perfect cover, and I speak
lawyer hired by 10 of the victims, who said thatfrom personal experience, 15 years ago as an
the FBI was investigating the matter.investment pup, to my eternal shame, I got
The criminals are clearly to blame here, however,caught in a the same scam.
this is a problem that, in our opinion, is caused inSo we have an 'investment' that is supposed to
part, by the regulators themselves.be super secret, has a minimum investment and
There is a scam out there that is based onis not advertised anywhere. Do elements of this
"Prime Bank Guarantees" or "Medium Termring any bells?
Notes" that has taken billions from investors withSimply put, the regulators are perpetuating the
promises of astronomical returns. The SEC web'secrecy' of hedge funds by not allowing
site says:advertisement of the funds. Their rules about only
"Lured by the promise of astronomical profits andbeing able to invest a certain amount of money
the chance to be part of an exclusive,did not protect the people in this case who
international investing program, investors are onceinvested $5000, did it? Something tells me the
again falling prey to bogus "prime bank" scams.scammers did not check to see what the net
These fraudulent schemes involve the purportedworth of the investors was either.
issuance, trading, or use of so-called "prime" bank,How would advertising funds have helped? As
"prime" European bank or "prime" world bankwith everything, the fact that advertising is
financial instruments, or other "high yieldallowed generates an awareness of a particular
investment programs" ("HYIP"s). The fraud artistsindustry. How many of you knew how to play
who promote these schemes often use the wordpoker before the online casinos plastered the web
"prime" – or a synonymous phrase, such aswith advertising? My limit was 'Snap', now I am a
"top fifty world banks" – to cloak theirstone cold poker shark.
programs with an air of legitimacy."By the very nature of advertising and, therefore,
The thing that allows the bogus 'brokers' andinformative web sites, brochures etc etc, this kind
'investment managers' of this fraud to operate isof fraud would be more difficult to perpetrate
that they have created a veil of secrecy overbecause the veil of secrecy would be lifted for all
the whole operation. The SEC says:to see.
"Promoters claim that transactions must be keptOf course, there will always be criminal elements
strictly confidential by all parties, making clientwho will attempt to subvert whatever rules are
references unavailable. They may characterize theout there but the regulators throughout the world
transactions as the best-kept secret in thedon't need to make it easy by perpetuating a
banking industry, and assert that, if asked, banksecrecy myth that can be exploited by the
and regulatory officials would deny knowledge ofcriminal element.
such instruments. Investors may be asked to sign