Response to HR Magazine's February 2009 Cover Story

iv>laughing for a second and could not type. Okay, I
In the February 2009 issue of HR magazine, aagree that customizing does increase the cost at
cover story was written and titled “Strategiesthe front end of the project but truthfully, with
for saving in a down economy.” I read themy prior business, most of the time we
article and agreed with much of what was saidcustomized systems it was to create interfaces
until I got to a section on technology and contactbetween various systems. This type of
management.customization is likely going to significantly
 Here’s the section with which I have adecrease manual input hours and decrease the
serious concern.  likelihood of manual entry errors. As far as
“Technology and Contract Management” customization causing “glitches that will
Your mailbox probably overflows with ads forcompromise service later on,” I am not sure
software that vendors say you can’twhat this really means. I would be interested to
afford not to buy. But unless a vital systemhear a real life example from the author.
hovers on the brink of meltdown, hold out.  “Bargain Hard”? On the surface, this is
Three options to tide you over and limit costs ongood advice but highly unlikely to succeed since
new purchases:terms for support or leased contracts are exactly
Open up. Cut back on software license fees bythat, contracts. If you are buying a new system,
switching to free “open source” alternatives.which the author says you should hold out on,
For instance, Google Docs allows users to createyou may be able to bargain for a slightly lower
documents and spreadsheets, store them andcost but I would not expect it to work with
collaborate online for free.existing contracts. “Take care in designing an
No Special Request. Think twice before asking aall-inclusive proposal: Add-ons can cost you. And
vendor to customize an off-the-shelf product toinvolve vendors in proposal development —
fit your existing processes. It raises cost at thethey may offer money-saving tips.” I would
front end and could cause glitches that willcomment on this statement but I have no clue
compromise service later on.what it means.  
Bargain hard. Establish a policy of rebidding allLook, if you want to save money on HR
vendor contracts and leases. During a recession,technology, it can be done. Frankly, books could
prices, as well as payment terms and schedules,be written on this exact topic. If your company is
become negotiable. Take care in designing anlaying off employees, including those in HR, it
all-inclusive proposal: Add-ons can cost you. Andmight be important to add technology to allow
involve vendors in proposal development —your department to run more efficiently. There
they may offer money-saving tips.” have also been a number of articles and studies
February 2009 HR Magazineshowing how HR software does, in fact, save
My overall concern with this segment of thecompanies money. Here’s one good
article is that it is completely lacking in any detail,example.  
substance, or value.  The article is about 8 pagesI wrote a post recently about saving money by
long and barely two paragraphs are dedicated tolooking for alternatives to the national payroll
saving money on technology. I think the authorcompanies. In a real life example, my prior
grossly miscalculates the importance ofconsulting company saved a 1,200 employee
technology for HR. Has the author ever worked inmanufacturing company over $250,000 off their
HR? I wonder if they have ever gone from apayroll processing cost for the next five years. At
company that provided HR with neededthe same time, we provided the company
technology to one that did not. If you have, I amincreased functionality such as Employee Self
sure you know what I am talking about.  Service and custom interfaces between various
“Open up?” Can you please provide me withapplications. We did it all without having to use
a list of free “open source” softwareGoogle Docs. The point I made in that post was
alternatives for companies that process time andthat you can increase functionality and decrease
attendance, handle recruiting, process reviews,cost by looking for alternatives to the national
handle benefits administration, or process payroll?payroll processing companies. For this company, it
Wait; there aren’t any. I am not sure howwas wise for them not to “hold off.”   I
any HR department is going to meet any ofwrote another post on saving money on your
these mandatory needs using Google Docs. I haveHRIS tech support fees. One of our vendors
also written several other posts presentingwrote yet another article titled “Powerful can
arguments against open source HRIS solutions.be affordable.
“No Special Request”? Sorry, but I was