Why Your Best Employees Don't Deserve To Be Managers

You'd think we'd know by now -- just becausethem for getting better and better at that work,
someone is fantastic at doing something... doesn'trather than only paying them more if they step
mean they're equally as good at managing others"up" to management... where they may generate
to do that same thing.less value for the organization?
After all, the skill set required to practice aIsn't a top salesman better off staying in the field
specific profession -- whether it's plumbing,selling... than floundering in the office, struggling to
hairdressing, engineering, selling, teaching,organize and motivate his staff?
accounting or whatever -- is entirely differentDoesn't a terrific teacher do more for her
from the skill set required to manage people.students, herself and the school by staying in the
Yet organizations persist in promoting "doers" intoclassroom, than spending her time doing
management roles. These promotions come withpaperwork and trying to manage other teachers?
better-sounding titles, more money, moreFortunately, some organizations have seen the
perquisites, more prestige and... more responsibility.light. They do tie greater rewards to greater
And they involve doing less -- perhaps none -- ofresponsibilities and greater performances within
the "technical" work that the manager didthe same role. In fact, some companies, like
previously, and more (or all) of the work ofinvestment banks, are renown for paying traders
managing others.and sales people much, much more than the
In one sense it's logical -- a manager who used topeople who manage them, simply because, in the
do the work himself or herself should understandeyes of the bank, the traders and sales people
what his staff need to do the work now. Andgenerate more value.
yes, there are many managers who are just asOf course, as a "manager's advocate" I would
good, if not better, at managing others as theynever suggest that managers shouldn't be
are performing the actual work. In fact, manycompensated well, especially given the challenges
managers prefer to manage rather than do.of managing people.
But, as indicated above, there's no reason toBut to be as productive and profitable as possible,
assume that a good doer will make automaticallyorganizations should tie greater pay and rewards
make a good manager!to greater responsibilities and performances,
Now, this is not to say that a pyramidalwhatever the role. That way, they'll have people
organizational structure -- where the many aredoing and being their best.
managed by the few -- is necessarily a bad thing.So if you're responsible for "promoting" people, I
As a delegation or management structure iturge you to think twice before promoting your
works fine for many companies.best people into management roles... and out of
But when getting more pay and other rewards isthe jobs they love and do well at.
contingent on becoming a manager, it's inevitableInstead, consider whether you can enlarge, or
that people will try to get, and will get, promotedgive them more challenges in, their current role?
into management roles -- regardless of whetherOr, if they've performed exceptionally well, can
they have the talent or passion to manage.you give them a bonus or some other special
The result? Plenty of unhappy and ineffectivereward to recognize their efforts?
managers. Plenty of frustrated people working forOf course, if you work for someone else, you
ineffective managers. And an organization that ismay be limited in terms of what you can do... but
not performing at its optimum.if that's the case, and you're committed to
Doesn't it make more sense for people to do thestaying with your current employer... it may be
work they enjoy and are good at? To rewardtime to start a revolution!