Will Automated "Near - Miss Incident Reporting" Benefit Companies Or Alienate Employees?

I find the direction that truck driving, hauling andand email about an event. She has been told that
product delivery is going very interesting. This is aeach employee involved in an event must be
group of companies like Pepsi, Frito Lay, Kraft,coached within 3 days. Now let's suppose that she
Eddy's Ice Cream, Schwan's, Ecolab, and othershas 14 drivers and today she receives a total of
that are engaged in the local delivery of products4 event reports. Where will she find the time to
of services.talk with or coach these drivers? And now the
At one moment they have employees who arenext day she gets 2 more event reports. Are her
professional drivers, and the next they aredrivers really that bad? Sometimes they are, but
engaged in physical delivery of products ornot always.
services. The work involves driving through cityWith most of the devices in use, the drivers
traffic all day long, and making dozens of stops toknow immediately when an event is recorded, so
deliver goods. It's physically demanding work.they are waiting for the call from their supervisor.
Needless to say, crashes and physical injuries areThe drivers already know that they will have to
common.sit down with the supervisor and discuss the
Lately, some of these delivery companies havesituation that set off the device. They brace for,
been approached by organizations selling"What were you doing wrong?", "Slow down and
technology that monitors the driving performancedon't follow so closely!", "One more event and
of the delivery drivers. These on-board devicesyou're out of here!"
range in complexity, usually recording rapid vehicleI think you see the trend. Not only are the events
movements like sharp turns or hard stops andin and of themselves negative, but the
sending the data via cell technology to datainteractions and their repeat nature are negative
centers for processing. Some of these technologyas well. Automated near-miss reporting can be
companies even uses video to capture incidentsvery good, but how do you factor in the
for coaching. I must admit that this is great"catching you doing something right" situations. It
information and is quite accurate in capturingcan't be all bad if we want to engage the drivers
near-miss events (and a few crashes as well).and get them to change for the better!
Occasionally, the video clips show the lack of seatThere are many factors needed in order for
belts and cell phone usage. It's great informationnear-miss reporting to be effective. Included are:
for behavior change coaching. I call it "Automateda willingness by the organization to learn from its
Near-Miss Reporting".mistakes, open and honest communication
The more I have learned about these systems,between workers and supervisors, the removal
the more I see their value. However, I also seeof fear of reprisal for reporting, positive
them being used inappropriately. Rather than usedmotivation to report near-miss situations, and
to find drivers who need to improve their drivingpositive actions taken immediately to eliminate the
habits and providing coaching toward that end,problems reported.
some companies use the technology primarily toIt will be very interesting to see how these
weed out bad apples.technology companies and their systems develop
Okay, I'll be the first to say that some bad appleover the coming years. I'll bet that the technology
weeding may be necessary. But, since thesecompany that figures out how to help their clients
systems are usually catching events that involveimprove their overall safety culture, while using
something that's wrong, they can't be used verytheir devices will be the big winner. And the direct
effectively for positive motivation. What about alldelivery companies who effectively incorporate
the good things done all day long, and overonboard technology and develop sustainable
thousands of miles driven? How are theysafety cultures will reap big rewards through
reported and rewarded?decreased costs, driver retention and improved
Then, imagine being a supervisor who receivesprofitability.