What is holding back the adoption of Solar Generated Electricity in the United States?

Copyright (c) 2008 Paul Calhounin the US Senate. Southern Co., American Electric
The US currently has about 700 megawatts ofPower Co. and other coal fired producers hired
installed solar panel electricity generationtop Washington lobbyists, including Rudy Giuliani's
connected to the grid, according to research byfirm, to help defeat a measure that would force
the consulting firm, Navigant. This represents lessthem to boost electricity generated by wind, solar
than 1% of all the electricity generated in the US.and other forms of renewable energy to 15
Each state controls the speed of solar adoptionpercent of the U.S. total by 2020. That's up from
by heir independent policies. If these policiesless than 2 percent today, and is a move the
remain nchanged, generation from solar panels inindustry says would cost at least $67 billion.
the US, both commercial and residentialSouthern Co. has spent $7.26 million this year
generators are expected to grow to 6,000lobbying Congress, more than Exxon Mobil Corp.
megawatts by the year 2015.or General Motors Corp., according to the
Three thousand of the 6,000 megawatts will beWashington-based Center for Responsive Politics.
generated in California. The incentive programs ofIt hired such firms as Bracewell & Giuliani LLP,
California are the gold standard among supporterswhere Republican presidential front-runner Giuliani
of solar power. Growth in the home solar-poweris a partner. The bill would require utilities to obtain
market will not take off until more states adopt2.75 percent of their power from renewable
favorable net metering rules. The relaxed solarsources starting in 2010, ramping that up to 15
implementation can offset the cost of installingpercent by 2020. Almost one-quarter of the
renewable power system and capture electricitymandate could be met by improving efficiency.
that is being loss from the potential solarCompanies that fail to meet the standard would
generation. The Navigant report estimates that anhave to pay a penalty to the federal government.
additional 3,000 megawatts of solar panelThe cooperative of Southern Co and other
electricity could be available in the next eightgenerating companies consider this too high of a
years if the states with solar implementationbarrier and appear to have succeeded to remove
limitations lifted their caps.the renewable fuel section from the bill going to
There are eight states that have no net-meteringPresident Bush.
rules. These states are South Dakota, Kansas,The average homeowner does not have a vote
Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Florida, Arizonain adopting renewable fuels electrical generation
and my own state, South Carolina. A list compiledstandards. The battle is being conducted by the
by New Energy Source lists California, Newstate and federal government and powerful
Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Maryland receiving theelectrical generating companies. The problem is
highest scores for solar adaptation with thethat the average homeowner will be the big loser
remaining states of lower scores because ofin this struggle. Our major recourse is to write our
restrictive laws.state and federal representative to adopt
As of September 2007, 39 states had adoptedmeasure that we can utilize the potential cost
some measures of rules to compensatesavings and reduces pollution of solar generated
consumers for sending self-generated renewableelectricity.
power to the grid. There is a lot behind theOur letters to our government representatives
scenes that the states and power generationshould ask for means to:
companies are willing to wage a serious fight to* Encourage greater renewable-energy generation
preclude Federal mandates to push solar* Promote customer-sited distributed generation
renewable energy.(wind and solar fuels)
In my state of South Carolina, the Santee* Reduce demand on an ever increasingly strained
Electrical Cooperative, which is owned by thegrid
state of South Carolina, is proposing a $998 million* Reward investment in renewable technologies
dollar coal burning generators. The site has been* Facilitate energy independence
put on hold by the federal government for a* Improve air quality and public health
deeper study of the environmental impact.* Promote in-state economic development.
Meanwhile, Santee continues the fight with theirMost states that have revised their
commissioned study. Their study concludes "$900interconnection and net-metering policies have
million in economic output, $500 million in earningsdone so in pursuit of these same goals.
and 9,300 jobs for South Carolinians"I have a BS and MS in Metallurgical Engineering.
Unfortunately; Santee made no attempt to studyThirty six years spent in the development of
the environmental impact or what a combinationsemiconductors. Business experience in start up
of renewable/nonrenewable future actions wouldbusiness plan. Currently, an oyster farmer and
mean to the state.interested in helping the environment by deploying
The federal renewable fuels bill has been stoppedsolar energy.